Association between interrupted access to sex work community services during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in sex workers' occupational conditions: findings from a community-based cohort study in Vancouver, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Globally, criminalisation has shaped sex workers' structural exclusion from occupational protections, and this exclusion has been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. While community organisations aim to bridge this gap through providing health and safety resources for sex workers, many were forced to scale back services when Canadian provinces declared a state of emergency at the pandemic onset. As little empirical research has examined the impacts of sex work community services interruptions amid COVID-19, our objectives were to (1) examine the correlates of interrupted access to community services and (2) model the independent association between interrupted access to community services and changes in working conditions (ie, self-reported increases in workplace violence or fear of violence), among sex workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: As part of an ongoing community-based cohort of sex workers in Vancouver, Canada (An Evaluation of Sex Workers Health Access, 2010-present), 183 participants completed COVID-19 questionnaires between April 2020 and April 2021. ANALYSIS: Cross-sectional analysis used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression with explanatory and confounder modelling approaches. RESULTS: 18.6% of participants (n=34) reported interrupted access to community services (closure/reduction in drop-in hours, reduced access to spaces offering sex worker supports and/or reduced access/contact with outreach services). In multivariable analysis, sex workers who had difficulty maintaining social supports during COVID-19 (adjusted OR, AOR 2.29, 95% CI 0.95 to 5.56) and who experienced recent non-fatal overdose (AOR 2.71, 95% CI 0.82 to 8.98) faced marginally increased odds of service interruptions. In multivariable confounder analysis, interrupted access to community services during COVID-19 was independently associated with changes in working conditions (ie, self-reported increases in workplace violence or fear of violence; AOR 4.00, 95% CI 1.01 to 15.90). CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight concerning implications of community service interruptions for sex workers' labour conditions. Sustainable funding to community organisations is urgently needed to uphold sex workers' occupational safety amid COVID-19 and beyond.

Barriers to Governmental Income Supports for Sex Workers during COVID-19: Results of a Community-Based Cohort in Metro Vancouver

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into stark focus the economic inequities faced by precarious, criminalized and racialized workers. Sex workers have been historically excluded from structural supports due to criminalization and occupational stigma. Given emerging concerns regarding sex workers' inequitable access to COVID-19 income supports in Canada and elsewhere, our objective was to identify prevalence and correlates of accessing emergency income supports among women sex workers in Vancouver, Canada. Data were drawn from a longstanding community-based open cohort (AESHA) of cis and trans women sex workers in Metro Vancouver from April 2020–April 2021 (n = 208). We used logistic regression to model correlates of access to COVID-19 income supports. Among 208 participants, 52.9% were Indigenous, 6.3% Women of Colour (Asian, Southeast Asian, or Black), and 40.9% white. Overall, 48.6% reported accessing income supports during the pandemic. In adjusted multivariable analysis, non-injection drug use was associated with higher odds of accessing COVID-19 income supports (aOR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.31–5.07), whereas Indigenous women faced reduced odds (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30–1.01). In comparison with other service workers, access to income supports among sex workers was low overall, particularly for Indigenous sex workers, demonstrating the compounding impacts of colonization and disproportionate criminalization of Indigenous sex workers. Results highlight the need for structural supports that are low-barrier and culturally-safe to support sex workers' health, safety and dignity.

Qualitative evaluation of a mandatory health insurance 'wait period' in a publicly funded health system: understanding health inequities for newcomer im/migrant women.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate impacts of a residency-based waiting period for health insurance coverage on lived experiences of health and settlement for im/migrant women in British Columbia, Canada. DESIGN: The IRIS study is a mixed-methods, community-based, qualitative evaluation of recently arrived im/migrant women's access to sexual and reproductive care. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted by trained multilingual and multicultural interviewers with lived migration experience in the participant's preferred language. SETTING: Metro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada from July 2018 to January 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Data collected from community focus groups (four groups, n=29) of both service providers and im/migrant women was used. Following this, qualitative interviews with service providers (n=10) and im/migrant women (n=47) were conducted. Eligible participants self-identified as women; were aged 18-49 and had arrived in Canada from another country. Eligible providers were employed in the health, social or legal sectors working with im/migrant women. RESULTS: The wait period resulted in mistrust and internalised stigma for racialised im/migrant women, for whom the policy resulted in feeling 'undeserving' of care. Resulting administrative burden produced delays and unmet need for care, particularly related to sexual and reproductive healthcare and children's health. Unexpected costs meant difficult choices between survival and care. Negative health outcomes included the inability to family plan, difficulties during pregnancy, as well as hardships related not being able to seek help for sick children. Community-based organisations provided support in many areas but could not fill all gaps produced by this policy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight severe, yet commonly overlooked, health inequities produced by a mandatory health coverage wait period within a purportedly 'universal' healthcare system. Health system policies such as mandatory 'waiting periods' produce discriminatory and inequitable outcomes for im/migrant women. Policy reforms towards full 'healthcare for all' are urgently needed to affirm the health and human rights of all im/migrants.